Worldwide Ranking Points Tables for 2023 CrossFit Semifinals

Earlier this week, CrossFit released its updated Worldwide Rankings. The update included points earned from the Semifinals that just wrapped up earlier this month. The publication of the rankings was just that, however. It only included the Top 100 men and women with the ‘by competition’ breakdown of points and the comprehensive ranking of all Quarterfinals athletes.

While the rankings have been released, CrossFit never published the points tables that outlines how many points are assigned to each finish within the Semifinals.

When CrossFit originally published the points system, it was based on the Semifinals structure from 2021 and 2022 where all fields were 30 athletes deep with a set number of qualifying spots. Also, CrossFit removed the points tables shortly after publication and replaced them with a high-level overview.

Luckily, I was able to save those and published the Semifinals Worldwide Ranking points tables in an article back in January.

The problem is that with the larger 60-athlete fields in North America and Europe, combined with the fact that these Semifinals sent a different number of athletes to the Games (i.e. North America West men qualified 9 while North America East men qualified 12).

In that original article by CrossFit, they stated the following:

“For the 2023 season, updated points tables for all Semifinals will be based on the final number of Games-qualifying positions at each competition. In addition, the North America and Europe Semifinals points tables will reflect the larger, 60-athlete fields present at those competitions. Semifinals with a higher number of qualifying positions/larger field of athletes will have a more gradual decline in points per placement.”

But those points tables were never published. Not before the competition. And now not even after the rankings were updated.

So we decided to calculate the Semifinals points tables and publish them for all to see.


Africa, Asia, Oceania and South America

The Semifinals points tables for the smaller regions did not change from 2021/2022. The same number of athletes qualified to the Games as previous years and the fields remained at 30 athletes.

Place Africa Asia/S. Am Oceania
1st 4,000 4,000 4,000
2nd 1,800 2,000 3,000
3rd 800 1,200 2,200
4th 400 600 1,600
5th 300 400 1,000
6th 250 300 600
7th 200 200 400
8th 190 190 300
9th 180 180 200
10th 170 170 180
11th 160 160 170
12th 150 150 160
13th 140 140 150
14th 130 130 140
15th 120 120 130
16th 110 110 120
17th 100 100 110
18th 90 90 100
19th 80 80 90
20th 70 70 80
21st 60 60 70
22nd 50 50 60
23rd 40 40 50
24th 30 30 40
25th 25 25 35
26th 20 20 30
27th 15 15 25
28th 10 10 20
29th 5 5 15
30th 0 0 0

 

North America and Europe

Here is where the points tables changed. The points are now spread out across the 60-athlete field and are slightly adjusted for the number of qualifying spots. By slightly, I mean that the top 10 does not change regardless of whether 9 athletes qualify or 12. The variations between the points tables all occur beginning in 11th place and trickle down from there.

Place 12 Qualifiers
NAE Men
11 Qualifiers
NAE Women
Europe (M/W)
10 Qualifiers
NAW Women
9 Qualifiers
NAW Men
1st 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000
2nd 3,750 3,750 3,750 3,750
3rd 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
4th 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250
5th 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
6th 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750
7th 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500
8th 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250
9th 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
10th 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750
11th 1,670 1,650 1,600 1,500
12th 1,590 1,550 1,500 1,450
13th 1,510 1,500 1,450 1,400
14th 1,450 1,450 1,400 1,350
15th 1,400 1,400 1,350 1,300
16th 1,350 1,350 1,300 1,250
17th 1,300 1,300 1,250 1,200
18th 1,250 1,250 1,200 1,150
19th 1,200 1,200 1,150 1,100
20th 1,150 1,150 1,100 1,050
21st 1,100 1,100 1,050 1,000
22nd 1,050 1,050 1,000 950
23rd 1000 1,000 950 900
24th 950 950 900 850
25th 900 900 850 800
26th 850 850 800 750
27th 800 800 750 700
28th 750 750 700 650
29th 700 700 650 600
30th 650 650 600 550
31st 635 635 550 535
32nd 620 620 535 520
33rd 605 605 505 505
34th 590 590 490 490
35th 575 575 475 475
36th 560 560 460 460
37th 545 545 445 445
38th 530 530 430 430
39th 515 515 415 415
40th 500 500 400 400
41st 485 485 385 385
42nd 470 470 370 370
43rd 455 455 355 355
44th 440 440 340 340
45th 425 425 325 325
46th 410 410 310 310
47th 395 395 295 295
48th 380 380 280 280
49th 365 365 265 265
50th 350 350 250 250
51st 310 310 225 225
52nd 270 270 200 200
53rd 230 230 175 175
54th 190 190 150 150
55th 150 150 125 125
56th 110 110 100 100
57th 85 85 75 75
58th 60 60 50 50
59th 35 35 25 25
60th 0 0 0 0

 

Takeaways

In looking at the points tables, there is very little difference in the points earned across the larger North American and European Semifinals, even when the number of qualifying positions varies rather significantly. 

With it being more difficult to qualify out of North America East in the men’s field, taking the 12th and final qualifying spot earns an athlete 1,590 points. However, in the “easier” North America West men’s field, the last qualifying spot (9th place) earns 2,000 points. This is the same number of points as 9th place in North America East.

And when comparing 12th place in both North America East and North America West, the points awarded are 1,590 and 1,450, respectively. The difference is almost immaterial and the worldwide ranking will ultimately be based on their finish at the CrossFit Games.

Of course, this doesn’t really matter because all that matters is that an athlete be in the Top 100 to count towards their Semifinals’ D’Hondt calculation. This means that those bubble athletes around the top 100 are what matters…and those point differentials are even smaller.

At the end of the day, this system appears to be what will be used going forward. Let’s just hope there is a little more transparency and the points tables are published in advance of the competition in the future.

YouTube video

Trending Articles